Dixielander

Home Forums Free Flight Nostalgia Gas Dixielander

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40681
    JIM MOSELEY
    Participant

    George Fuller’s “Dixielander” – as originally kitted in England – has, at long last, been approved as Nostalgia legal. A reliable, good flying airplane!



    #44571
    Dean McGinnes
    Participant

    Are plans available? If so, a source please.

    #44572
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi FlyDean

    Just about everybody in the “English speaking world” will have a copy of this plan but if you go to my website I have it listed under AA plans.

    A great model for the OS 15 or 19.

    Ployd in OZ

    #44573
    Dean McGinnes
    Participant

    Thanks, will do when I get home tonight. Always looking for new ideas. πŸ™‚

    #44574
    DON MYERS
    Participant

    Hi flydean and all: The Dixielander (A.A.Hales, Yeoman Models kits)
    plan is available as Plan#237, on page 5 of the Catalog of Plans (and has been for sometime, as “Nostalgia Gas”).
    Price, last I looked was $8.00 for members. The NFFS Plan Service Catalog is downloadable on this site. One can get sidetracked as the “Approved Designs” list, is somewhere also listed as “Plans List” There is an order form to download, and I ordered by snailmail. Service was prompt.
    Cheers:deezil_don
    PS: Not all the engines listed on the plan are “Nostalgia Eligible Engines”
    Consult the the current 2007-2008 Official Competition Rules for
    Eligible “Glows” and “Diesels”

    #44575
    Dean McGinnes
    Participant

    Thanks deezildon, I was wondering if the NFFS listed plan was the approved version.

    I will order from NFFS

    #44576
    DAN BERRY
    Participant

    For what its worth–
    Denny Dock was flying a Dixielander in CD Classic at the NATS. He was 2nd place, with a long overrun on the last flight. His long overrun was gentler than mine on Monday. Of course, they fly different when a KB 7.5 gets bolted to the nose.

    #44577
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dan,
    πŸ˜€ My model is a modified version of the “Dixie”. I used a flat bottom wing and geodetic construction to handle the power. You are being very kind not to mention my A Nos Gas OR that had the same results as yours!!! πŸ˜₯
    Did I hear a Dyna-Jet at the 71 Glenview Nats outside the hanger,or was that this year?? πŸ˜‰
    DD

    #44578
    Bill Shailor
    Participant

    That Dyna-Jet was like music to me. Brought back a lot of great memories!

    #44579
    DAN BERRY
    Participant

    Denny
    Did you have a 40 second engine run? I didn’t hear about that.
    My 40 second engine run was less than fun. When a retrieve needs 2 trips on the bike, well, that’s a problem. On a positive note , the wing is back together and covered.

    #44580
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi DD

    Do you have a photo of your CD size modified Dixielander? I have an OS29 looking for a new model and a big Dixie appeals to me πŸ˜€

    Ployd in OZ

    #44581
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Try this site. Don DeLoach took a few shots of the model and put them in the Nats News http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/nats/natsnews. Check the Saturday Aug. 4th edition.
    DD



    #44582
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Anybody here have a 1/2 A D ‘Lander?? I’ve got a 233 framed up, getting ready to cover….any tips on the DT linkage, it sure could use some simplifying! Thanks, Jay

    #44583
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Mr. Mendoza,
    What % did you reduce the plan to get 233Sq’s. I was thinking about doing the same thing. I am currently working on a 115% flat bottom version like my CD model.
    πŸ˜€ Denny

    #44584
    DAN BERRY
    Participant

    Denny, here’s the trick to scaling.
    Square root of wing areas and bit of division.
    example

    Marval 560″ sq root 23.66
    Marval 1100 ” sq root 33.16

    33.16/23.66 = 1.40

    scale factor is 1.4
    Marval AB -72″ wingspan
    Marval Super D – 100.8″ wingspan

    I’m not certain if I should overlap the prop arcs on the KB 3.5s. That would require staggering the engines fore and aft. I’ll probably keep them about 10 ” apart on a triangle pylon.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.